![]() |
#1 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Inaugural Dragon Award winners named
![]() http://the-digital-reader.com/2016/0...ers-announced/ Quote:
Much more at the source, including nominees and winners. Three takes on the awards: https://madgeniusclub.com/2016/09/05...on-the-carpet/ https://maxviking.wordpress.com/2016...dragon-awards/ http://womenwriteaboutcomics.com/201...-puppy-awards/ As usual, I don't particularly care who wins awards. But the nomination list looks pretty solid and legit to me. Weber, Freer, Correia, Novik, Butcher, Sir Terry Pratchet (spoiler: he won his category), plus HBO, BETHESDA SOFTWORKS... a couple Indies, and even an Amazon Publishing title. Sounds pretty inclusive to me. (Check the comments on the Freer column.) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Wow, a SF awards list with authors that I'm mostly heard of. Who would have thought it.
Me, I try not to let an author's personal views keep me from buying their books as long as they don't rub my nose in it. I've read 5 of the 7 military SF books (need to check out the other two). I rather like some of Marko Kloos's books, so I really don't care if he is a puppy kicker or not. There isn't enough decent authors out there for me to cut off my nose to spite my face. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#3 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Just as a note, I just bought Ctrl-Alt-Revolt because I saw it on the list as a winner and it sounded interesting. They already have "Winner of the Dragon Award for Best Apocalyptic Novel 2016" in the review when I downloaded the metadata. That didn't take long.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,784
Karma: 198099188
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-07-2016 at 02:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
The Campbell award is supposed to be for the latter. Dragons are supposed to highlight what people are reading and *enjoying*. Which the Hugos stopped doing ages sgo. Like Nate, I still want to know how many people voted but the nomination list rings true. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advert | |
|
![]() |
#6 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,784
Karma: 198099188
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Well, I guess awards shortlists that primarily recognize the "good craft" of authors who most people are already well aware of (because of their good craft) are of little use to me then. *shrug*
I don't need them to promote unknowns, I only need them to promote authors who are unknown to me. I guess I don't understand the need for awards to highlight what people are reading and enjoying. Surely that knowledge is already known? Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-07-2016 at 02:57 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,784
Karma: 198099188
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Fair enough.
I'm just always a bit confused by a negative "I don't recognize any of these" reaction to an award list (as well as an "I know many of these" positive reaction). I'd prefer they ALL be unknown to me, to tell the truth. I'm looking for new authors to like, not external validation that books/authors I've already read and liked are deemed "good" by others. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Quote:
That's what the best _new_ author award is for! ![]() It's actually pretty straight forward. Most of us who have been reading a genre for a long time should be at least aware of most of the major authors in that genre. If there is a best of list of SF&F works for the year, and I don't recognize most of the authors, then odds are pretty good that their definition of best and my definition of best are very, very different. I can see a few newer authors, but not most. The other side of that is the experience side. I stopped following the hugos when I noticed that I didn't really like most of the novels or authors on the list for a number of years running. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,784
Karma: 198099188
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
I've been reading the genre myself for a long, long time. I just don't presume to have my finger on the pulse at all times--no one can. I frankly don't trust anyone who says they know the major players. It's not a static list. What that person is saying is that they're aware of most genre best-sellers--which isn't the same thing at all. To expect to be familiar with most names on a genre award shortlist is a wish for the genre to never evolve. Last edited by DiapDealer; 09-07-2016 at 07:39 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,806
Karma: 13399999
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US
Device: Nook Simple Touch, Kobo Glo HD, Kobo Clara HD, Kindle 4
|
Quote:
From what I've read over at file770.com, the Dragon literary winners were almost entirely the same as Vox Day's picks, and two of the winners were published by him. Coinicidence? Maybe, but awards based on votes from any valid email sound easy to spam. For those not paying attention to the Hugo Award dramas, Vox Day is the leader of the rabid puppy clique which has been trying to sabotage the Hugos with truly substandard nomination slates. It is interesting that several of the Dragon winners basically have fewer and lower ranked reviews at places like Amazon and goodreads than their competitors in their categories. However, the Dragon Awards were poorly publicized, so maybe their authors just had better get out the vote campaigns. That is not to say that I think all or most of the winners are bad, but I don't expect to care for another heavy handed Catholic theology based story by John C. Wright (whose Hugo nominess I detested) and whose book which won the SF novel category looks to be more like YA Christian fantasy. Likewise, Niemeier's Souldancer is not horror, it's more like epic space fantasy. David Weber likes infodumps too much and needs a good editor, and I'm not going to pick up the 8th book in a series when it's not standalone. I feel the same way about Naomi Novick's Dragon book being the 7th or 8th of a series except I've read most of the series and liked them, so I'll add it to my TBR list. If Nick Cole wasn't published by Vox Day, I'd consider checking it out, but Vox Day's never getting any of my money. Sorry Nick. Apparently Eric Flint will be involved with the running of next year's awards. He's no fan of slate nominations or slate voting, so I'm interested in seeing what changes there will be to the Dragon nomination and voting process. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 27,784
Karma: 198099188
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
I digress. I have nothing against this startup award, nor the cross-section of the huuuuuge genre fanbase to whom its nominations feel "right." All shortlists feel right to somebody after all. There's plenty of room for all tastes and all interpretations of "good craft."
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,806
Karma: 13399999
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US
Device: Nook Simple Touch, Kobo Glo HD, Kobo Clara HD, Kindle 4
|
I have no problem with DragonCon creating its own awards. It's a huge convention, well known and well respected. However, while I don't think they'll admit it, I think the first year was probably gamed by a small self-promoting clique, and if they don't figure out what they want to do with the awards and how to run the nomination and voting process, I don't think they'll end up with awards that will be respected and relied upon as they would like for something associated with their convention.
I don't doubt that John C. Wright has his fanatical fans. However once again, Vox Day published on his blog his choices for best novel, and two of his blog choices were published by him, and the one by John C. Wright with 132 ratings on Goodreads is nominated and wins, and another one published by him, edited by John C. Wright's wife, with 485 Goodreads ratings, is nominated and wins. For comparison, most of the Hugo award nominees for best novel had at least 8000 Goodreads ratings, if not much more. This plus the poorly run publicity for the initial year is why I wouldn't use this year's results as a recommendation list. If you like John C. Wright's books from the last couple years, you'll probably like the Weber and the Cole and maybe the rest of the winners. But be aware that this year's results were almost certainly gamed by the self-promoting alt-right Vox Day and his sock-puppets and trolls, and are probably suspect if you don't agree with his politics. Last edited by bgalbrecht; 09-07-2016 at 09:47 PM. Reason: revised 2nd paragraph |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Grand Sorcerer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
|
Quote:
It's pretty rare for new authors to make best of lists simply because it's tough for a new author to build up enough of a fan base to win against the name authors. As an example, Django Wexler had his first hit about 3 years ago. Think about some of the recent big hits by new SF/F authors and how many of those actually made the awards lists. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2015 Edgar award winners | AnemicOak | News | 1 | 05-07-2015 03:33 PM |
Nebula Award Winners and Nominations are Here! | stonetools | Reading Recommendations | 17 | 04-21-2012 08:50 AM |
How do you keep track of the award-winners? | ficbot | General Discussions | 8 | 05-26-2011 01:47 AM |
2009 Hugo Award Winners | Alexander Turcic | Reading Recommendations | 23 | 08-15-2009 07:02 PM |
2008 Hugo Award Winners | DMcCunney | News | 45 | 08-12-2008 04:55 PM |