03-21-2016, 04:38 PM | #1 |
Guru
Posts: 735
Karma: 35936
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shrewsury, MA
Device: Lenovo Android Tablet
|
Calibre-parallel.exe glitch?
Occasionally this process which normally seems to consume about 15 to 90MB of memory in each of the 2 or 3 parallel processes that run jumps to consume huge amounts of memory in one or more thread (up to 850MB.) When it does so, my windows 7 (core I3 with 4GB's of DRAM, running 64-bit windows 7) system becomes virtually non-responsive.
This issue has been repetitive but doesn't happen so often that it becomes a problem, until recently. It has survived thru many many calibre updates. My system is otherwise fine, and no other processes suffer this issue. Anyone have any ideas? Or has anyone else seen the same issue...? |
03-21-2016, 05:51 PM | #2 |
Well trained by Cats
Posts: 30,018
Karma: 57259778
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
|
You just gave it a big task to digest
W/only 4G RAM, have loads of VM space avail Preferences: Behavior: job priority: Low Preferences: Miscellaneous: Limit the max jobs to CPU cores |
Advert | |
|
03-21-2016, 06:18 PM | #3 |
null operator (he/him)
Posts: 20,725
Karma: 27405072
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
Pretty sure I only see more than one parallel.exe when calibre is doing jobs (conversions, word counts etc)
I have Prefs->Misc->Max simultaneous... jobs set to 1. I did some tests, and satisfied myself that doing what I do, on my rig, it is significantly faster to do 4 jobs serially that it is to do the same 4 jobs in parallel - and while they're chugging along I can do something else. BR |
03-21-2016, 06:29 PM | #4 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
I personally prefer to set it to one less than the number of CPU cores. Leaving one "free" core makes the system a lot more responsive when doing lengthy conversions. Obviously, though, this is very much a matter of personal preference.
|
03-22-2016, 07:34 AM | #5 | |
Guru
Posts: 735
Karma: 35936
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shrewsury, MA
Device: Lenovo Android Tablet
|
Quote:
|
|
Advert | |
|
03-22-2016, 07:35 AM | #6 |
Guru
Posts: 735
Karma: 35936
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shrewsury, MA
Device: Lenovo Android Tablet
|
|
03-22-2016, 04:51 PM | #7 | |
null operator (he/him)
Posts: 20,725
Karma: 27405072
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
|
Quote:
In other words is there a direct correlation between intermittent 'fat' parallels and one or more irregular news downloads. BR |
|
03-22-2016, 05:04 PM | #8 | |
Guru
Posts: 735
Karma: 35936
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shrewsury, MA
Device: Lenovo Android Tablet
|
Quote:
2) Yes, but this occurrence doesn't correlate to any specific download schedule as far as I can tell... and per my 'corrective action' in point one it doesn't reoccur so doesn't seem to be repetitive per specific news feeds... Thanks though. |
|
03-22-2016, 10:45 PM | #9 |
creator of calibre
Posts: 44,048
Karma: 22669822
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Device: Various
|
calibre-parallel.exe is a short lived worker process. A couple of them are kept idling around and when a new job starts it si assigned to one. If you are seeing excessive memory consumption, it means one of the news downlaod jobs (or conversion) is causing it. Just let it run, once the job completes, the process will be killed automatically.
And if you want to find out which one it is, download all your scheduled news one by one manually. |
03-23-2016, 08:07 AM | #10 |
Guru
Posts: 735
Karma: 35936
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Shrewsury, MA
Device: Lenovo Android Tablet
|
Not worth that effort... and it might not reveal it anyway, as when it happens, it is not consistently at the same stage in my download schedule (which is why I suspected a memory leak or similar.) Plus as I think I mentioned I kill Calibre via the task manager when it happens, and wait until all Calibre processes have stopped before restarting it. So far it has not yet reoccurred when I've done that... which again suggests to me that it is a glitch and not a power-hungry download since that download would restart. So far, I have not had to kill the process twice.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiple calibre-parallel.exe processes? | Phssthpok | Editor | 6 | 03-20-2015 08:34 AM |
Calibre-Parallel.exe Seeking Internet Access | ddjohn | Calibre | 10 | 09-14-2013 07:46 AM |
Calibre-parallel.exe | Indigo55 | Library Management | 3 | 10-05-2012 11:52 PM |
calibre-parallel.exe twice? | sideburnt | Calibre | 12 | 03-24-2012 08:51 PM |
calibre-parallel.exe crashes on book import | domee | Calibre | 2 | 07-06-2011 08:06 AM |