06-26-2012, 03:25 AM | #1 | ||
Banned
Posts: 304
Karma: 6102528
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: Kindle
|
Pressure Mounting for Judge Cote to Reject E-Book Settlement
http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2012...ok-settlement/
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-26-2012, 03:55 AM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
It's a reasonable argument. There's no doubt that the agency model reduces the ability of large sellers to dominate the market by undercutting the competition.
|
Advert | |
|
06-26-2012, 04:08 AM | #3 |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,627
Karma: 158546452
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
It's price fixing. But then, I really don't care how the decision goes. For non-essential goods and services, my preference is for providers to be allowed to charge anything they want. They should also be allowed to collude with one another as they going about setting up their pricing scheme. If this is objectionable to consumers, then don't buy it. After all, success or failure rests solely with them.
|
06-26-2012, 04:10 AM | #4 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
06-26-2012, 04:17 AM | #5 | |
monkey on the fringe
Posts: 45,627
Karma: 158546452
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
|
Quote:
In relation to books, I don't care which stores succeed and which ones fail. Just keep the government out of it and let the market work its course. |
|
Advert | |
|
06-26-2012, 04:51 AM | #6 |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
|
06-26-2012, 04:53 AM | #7 |
Guru
Posts: 733
Karma: 3593438
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Glo. Galaxy Tab S 8.4
|
Price fixing just encourages piracy. A lot of people will just roll over and pay the inflated prices, BUT more and more will just say to themselves "I'll just pirate it instead".
I'm not saying this is the right thing to do but once people get into the the habit of pirating stuff and find out how easy it is, you've pretty much lost them for good. So no, I don't believe the market will sort itself out, or at least not until the damage is done and a lot of damage is already done. |
06-26-2012, 04:57 AM | #8 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,951
Karma: 3000001
Join Date: Feb 2011
Device: Kindle 3 wifi, Kindle Fire
|
the market is affected by people's actions as well, so i've always been a bit confused whenever people say that they will just leave it to the "market", which is made up of people anyway.
as for price fixing, i think there's an acceptable limit/price ceiling, though it differs with each person and their perceived value of the product. i never pirated books before and don't feel the need to since there are kindle ebook lending circles available. plus i've got hundreds on my tbr list anyway. |
06-26-2012, 05:09 AM | #9 |
Wizard
Posts: 4,538
Karma: 264065402
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Taiwan
Device: HP Touchpad, Sony Duo 13, Lumia 920, Kobo Aura HD
|
When a market dominating group of 6 publishers meets and decides to implement an agency model (even starting on the same day!) and to raise consumer prices in the process, then that is illegal. And consumers were hurt, prices for bestsellers have increased significantly.
I agree with the monkey, let the market do its magic. Propping up some failing business models only hurts book buyers, the demise of the old distribution system is inevitable. |
06-26-2012, 06:01 AM | #10 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Oh, I agree. But it's important to note that it's the cartel that's illegal, not the price fixing.
|
06-26-2012, 06:42 AM | #11 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,992
Karma: 199001268
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
What do the people who want a judge to reject the current settlement actually want here? I mean, if three of the publishers decided to settle instead of pursuing the matter in court, surely no one's expecting a settlement that would actually be agreeable to them (or their industry)--or in their financial best interests--are they? Or are they saying the decision to settle should be ignored, dismissed, or what? I really don't get it. Which suggests to me it's posturing and nothing more. What would they suggest be done to the three publishers who voluntarily decided to submit to someone else's course of action in this matter?
I realize that the decision to settle doesn't carry any inherent admission of guilt, but surely it carries an acceptance that somebody else gets to dictate how you conduct your business for the next short while... and that you're probably not going to thrilled with the new short-term business plan? |
06-26-2012, 08:12 AM | #12 |
Evangelist
Posts: 456
Karma: 1044878
Join Date: Apr 2009
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 4
|
|
06-26-2012, 08:29 AM | #13 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
|
06-26-2012, 08:47 AM | #14 |
Interested Bystander
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
|
We haven't determined that it actually does benefit society, or that that is why they actually continue to do it, or that it is not a bad thing.
|
06-26-2012, 08:55 AM | #15 |
Professional Contrarian
Posts: 2,045
Karma: 3289631
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
|
The DoJ has explicitly stated that agency pricing is legal, and should be allowed to continue.
Again, agency pricing levels the playing field for retailers, and the Big Six did not collude with Apple to drive small publishers out of business. It is legal for producers to set required prices on their goods. Agency pricing is not inherently anticompetitive. The alleged illegal behavior was ultimately only in the collusion over the timing of the switch. That's why Random House is not being charged in the antitrust action, and is not required to change its pricing policies. To put it another way: The publishers should not be prevented from using a legal pricing method as punishment for collusion, and the DoJ should not degrade competition (and inexplicably favor Amazon) in order to fix anti-competitive behavior. If the publishers did in fact collude illegally, they should be fined and heavily supervised to prevent future collusion, much as is done in other antitrust actions. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do you judge a book by its cover? | Pax | General Discussions | 46 | 05-29-2012 11:19 AM |
Don't judge a book by it's cover | Joy736 | General Discussions | 27 | 01-17-2012 03:07 PM |
Go ahead, judge my book by its cover... | painthouse | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 6 | 07-12-2011 09:55 AM |
The Google Book Settlement | paulckennedy | News | 10 | 02-25-2010 02:11 PM |
Google Book Settlement Site Is Up; Paying Authors $60 Per Scanned Book | yagiz | News | 8 | 04-26-2009 01:43 AM |