06-09-2005, 03:11 AM | #1 | |
Fully Converged
Posts: 18,171
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
|
Microsoft's push e-mail isn't really push?
Is Microsoft trying to redefine the meaning of push e-mail? A few days ago the company's chief Steve Ballmer announced an Exchange Server feature pack to include "Direct Push Technology" - the delivery of e-mail to mobile devices without any action on the part of the user. At least one analyst, Yankee Group's John Jackson, has reason to doubt that Microsoft's new push email technology is really push at all.
In the case of Windows Mobile, the user's device checks back with the server at specified intervals to receive any pending e-mail deliveries. I digged a bit further and found this technical explanation from the Microsoft Exchange team: Quote:
[via News Factor and BBHub] |
|
06-09-2005, 08:36 AM | #2 | |
Technology Mercenary
Posts: 617
Karma: 2561
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Lyme, CT
Device: Direct Neural Implant
|
Quote:
Boy, I'm amazed that they keep innovating like this! |
|
Advert | |
|
06-09-2005, 08:49 AM | #3 |
Guru
Posts: 914
Karma: 3410461
Join Date: May 2004
Device: Kindle Touch
|
*EVIL GRIN*
How stupid do they think we are? RIM should sue them for misusing the label "push e-mail"! |
06-09-2005, 09:03 AM | #4 |
Technology Mercenary
Posts: 617
Karma: 2561
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Lyme, CT
Device: Direct Neural Implant
|
Ahem... ALL email is "push email". Its just a buzzword to mislead customers into believing they have some new technology that differentiates their device from other vendor's devices.
There's a reason why mail components are called MTA and MDA. More details here.. |
06-09-2005, 09:31 AM | #5 |
Guru
Posts: 914
Karma: 3410461
Join Date: May 2004
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Not really just a buzz word. It is specifically referring to the idea of having e-mails that have been received by a desktop or server mail system automatically transmitted to a PDA, laptop or other portable device.
|
Advert | |
|
06-09-2005, 09:48 AM | #6 |
Addict
Posts: 270
Karma: 298
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
This is no different than how Outlook communicates with Exchange server.
Having to support 6 frekin' Blackberry users in my enterprise, I am really happy about this. The Blackberry Integration server is one of the worst architected pieces of crap I've ever had the misfortune of being inflicted upon me. I'd rather have a device that could communicate directly with the server. |
06-11-2005, 06:41 AM | #7 |
Guru
Posts: 914
Karma: 3410461
Join Date: May 2004
Device: Kindle Touch
|
Looks like Ed Hardy from Brighthand liked your article, Alex:
Windows Mobile's Upcoming Email System Isn't Exactly Push... at least some credits would have been appropriate, don't you think? He is even pointing to the Microsoft Exchange team blog like you did. Oh well.... |
06-11-2005, 06:47 AM | #8 |
Fully Converged
Posts: 18,171
Karma: 14021202
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Switzerland
Device: Too many to count here.
|
Hmm that's bad yeah. I didn't invent the article either, which is why I gave partial credits to News Factor and BBHub.
Perhaps they just forgot? |
06-21-2005, 10:45 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jun 2005
Device: Motorola220
|
Typical for Microsoft (and not only...)
Well, it is well known, I guess, that Microsoft is much better at selling than at building. Apparently (and unfortunately), the US marketing community adopted the ancient Phoenicians maxim: "Either sell or be truthfull..." .
That is not to say that the quoted article is very clear by itself. The technology described there supposedly refers to upcoming Exchange SP2 but actually does not specify in which way it is different from the current implementation of ActiveSync. Nor does it tell exactly about this part where the device PERIODICALLY requesting the server to monitor new changes (how much it is different then from the scheduled syncs?). Besides, according to Microsoft in the current setup the server is initiating the sync by first sending notification to the device about new changes and only THEN the device initiate the sync. That makes sense. Then what's all this about device all the time sending requests to the server???? Whatever. It is also typical for Microsoft documentation. And to those who as one of the members who posted a little bit earlier about Blackberry server been a nightmare I just wanted to let know - do not keep a very high hopes for ActiveSync. I have tested somewhat similar to Blackberry GoodLink and then ActiveSync (on Exchange 2003). It took me ~3hrs to set up and make to work and GoodLink - very detailed and simple documentation, works flowlessly (plus some nice features). I still after four days can not make ActiveSync work. That is manual and scheduled sync from device works fine (though took me some time to figure it all out) but this famous "push" update which is not really "push" just would not work. Period. Actually, seems like it worked in the beginning and then just stopped, which makes it even worse. Documentation is poor and superficial and try to get troubleshooting info. Good luck with that. ActiveSync troubleshooting tool gives me a message "could not access CDO.Message" when I'm sending control message. Very informative! Either the tool or the ActiveSync is a crap (more likely its a tool problem - after I run it I have to restart IIS to be able to sync at all, even manually!). And what about UNDOCUMENTED feature - UP-To-Date notification works only 12.5 hrs after any manual sync! If you do not sync manually from the device after that you get no notification! And it seems it is by design. So do not tell me how ActiveSync will compete with something like GoodLink. You will loose more on air time charges and headaches than on GoodLink license fee by going with ActiveSync. Push it or pull it. |
06-22-2005, 05:12 AM | #10 |
Is papyrophobic!
Posts: 1,926
Karma: 1009999
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: USA
Device: Dell Axim
|
If you are right, vadim, looks like we are still a long time away from a suitable e-mail push technology ;( Sniff.
|
06-22-2005, 07:44 PM | #11 |
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jun 2005
Device: Motorola220
|
Not all that bad...
You bet, Collin, I AM right. However, it is not all that gloomy. First, GoodLink provides a very well documented and supported technology which is truly "push" (I do not know how good Blackberry or anything else is). Second, at least partially, ActiveSync still works. That is not an Up-Date-Notification feature but manual and scheduled sync. Push or pull, as long as it works it is fine. One advantage of 'pull' technology it is easily controllable on the cell side. That is you can schedule your device to check for updates, say, every 30 min and then, on weekend, when you do not really care, you can change it to check every 2 hrs. If you have an unlimited data plan then it is not that important that you send a request to the server even every 5 min, so it is almost real time update.
However, what is true, you have to pay for it (sniff, sniff) - data plan fee with ActiveSync and data plan AND license fee with GoodLink. |
04-29-2009, 10:36 PM | #12 |
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Karma: 10
Join Date: Apr 2009
Device: none
|
I have been supporting Blackberry's for many many years, I have also Supported Good's Solution and am beginning to Support the Active Sync solution also.
Blackberry is true push and utilise's the Blackberry devices unique id or PIN to associate and send things to the devices, but none the less the server is doing the work with "Notify" messages from the exchange telling it when things change. Most Blackberry users will tell you,there email is always on the device a few minutes earlier than they hit the outlook client. Good - was more or less an offshoot on Blackberry from my understanding some of the core members of Good's Design team were ex-RIM employee's so i'm guessing RIM are getting a nice settlement out of each Good subscription. Good again is a true push technology however and have some very good tools to troubleshoot and check if a device is still alive on the network. Activesync I personally don't regard this as a push service, to me it seems like an outlook client sitting on a mobile phone, nothing more nothing less. I did however believe there was an MS push service but I tend to believe this is just a coded SMS/TXT? which is sent to the phone telling it to go grab something new.. So overall yes there is a significant difference in the solutions and also with the devices which can be used for any given solution which ultimately means each business will need to choose the best for them. thats my 2cents anyway |
04-30-2009, 05:47 AM | #13 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
There's very little point in adding a comment to a 4-year-old thread .
|
04-30-2009, 08:10 AM | #14 |
Resident Curmudgeon
Posts: 76,305
Karma: 136006010
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
|
So why keep it open then?
|
04-30-2009, 08:25 AM | #15 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should ideas develop or do you push at them? | bthrowsnaill | Writers' Corner | 14 | 10-18-2010 06:41 PM |
problem with push notification | iPhoneExpert111 | Apple Devices | 3 | 08-09-2009 10:30 PM |
Someone give me a push | charadeur | Which one should I buy? | 109 | 12-11-2008 10:51 PM |
Push my button! | vivaldirules | Lounge | 24 | 12-18-2007 11:35 AM |
Push vs. Pull | pixiepurls | Amazon Kindle | 2 | 11-22-2007 04:42 PM |