07-30-2010, 12:57 PM | #1 |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
This Edition Copyright...
I noticed a lot of PD books I'm getting from the library are stamped with "this edition copyright 20xx" and the publisher has applied their DRM. In reading some of these, I believe that they've just taken Gutenberg text, applied some basic formatting, and are now trying to make some money off of it.
Here, on MobileRead, we have some very nice editions of PD books that are being posted with no copyright notice at all. People have put a lot of work into these. What's to stop the big publishers from picking them up, DRM'ing them, and selling them, making money from our work without even crediting us? Many people have no idea you can download these books for free and they're buying them. Also, other companies are using them as promotional - e.g. Indigo told me a new Kobo comes with $1,500 worth of books pre-installed for free. Reading the Kobo books, some even contain the Gutenberg stamp - hardly $1,500 worth of books. I'm thinking we need to start applying edition-based copyright to our library here at MobileRead that includes things like "This edition is copyright 2010 (person who posted the book). It must not be sold, used for promotional purposes, or edited without written permission." Also add some wording allowing MobileRead to provide it for download, allowing others to share/copy/format shift for personal use, etc. - let's protect our work and ensure that people know it came from here, and that we made it, not some big publisher. This will bring more people here, grow the community of editors, and increase the overall quality of the books instead of lining the pockets of the big publishers who are, for all intents and purposes, stealing our work and claiming rights to it. |
07-30-2010, 01:55 PM | #2 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
You can't place usage restrictions on something that's in the public domain; nor would I personally wish to do so. In commercial editions of public domain works, there's generally additional material such as an introduction, explanatory notes, etc. That material is of course subject to copyright even if the book's text is in the public domain.
Last edited by HarryT; 07-30-2010 at 01:59 PM. |
Advert | |
|
07-30-2010, 02:41 PM | #3 | |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
Quote:
|
|
07-30-2010, 03:00 PM | #4 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
There is (in some countries, anyway) such a thing as a "typographical copyright", which has a fixed term of 25 years, but it only applies in situations where some non-trivial effort has gone into laying out the work. In most cases, the copyright message is mere "boilerplate" text and completely unenforcible.
|
07-30-2010, 04:31 PM | #5 |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
Hmmm... This leads to something else, then. If the DRM is not actually protecting copyright (since the work is PD), is it still illegal to break the DRM? Any opinion about US law or the current bill before Parliament in Canada?
|
Advert | |
|
07-30-2010, 06:19 PM | #6 |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
It just occurred to me that if a technological protection measure is enforceable for PD works, then it doesn't matter if copyright expires or not, the content publishers still maintain control. For example, all movies for the last several decades have either CSS or Macrovision to protect them. In effect, copyright never expires on any digital media. Ever. Until the law changes. Because you're not allowed to break the TPM.
|
08-05-2010, 12:35 PM | #7 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,013
Karma: 251649
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tempe, AZ, USA, Earth
Device: JetBook Lite (away from home) + 1 spare, 32" TV (at home)
|
Bsck in tyhe '60s, a lot of PD Irish folk music was copyrighted. I wouldn't suprised to see the same being done to PD books.
|
08-06-2010, 11:11 AM | #8 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
If you record even a traditional song, that recording has a performance copyright. The song itself may be traditional, and the lyrics and music in the public domain, but your specific performance of that song does have a copyright.
|
08-06-2010, 03:45 PM | #9 |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
Interesting that I can do a five minute performance and have the ability to record it and control it via copyright, but I can't copyright the hundred+ hours of work spent laying out an eBook. My layout is my artistic interpretation of how the book should be seen and I should be able to control how it's used (including having the right to say you cannot apply DRM to my layout or any derivatives of it and you cannot profit from it).
|
08-06-2010, 04:21 PM | #10 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2010, 07:24 PM | #11 |
Groupie
Posts: 165
Karma: 339490
Join Date: May 2010
Device: nook, BlackBerry
|
In researching this I found that Australia will give typographical copyright for a printed book, but not for an eBook. I wonder why?
|
08-12-2010, 04:29 AM | #12 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,413
Karma: 13369310
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
Device: Sony PRS T3, Kobo Glo, Kindle Touch, iPad, Samsung SB 2 tablet
|
I'm working on an illustrated version of The Woman in White - the illustrations come from the serialised version in Harper's Weekly. The gentleman who has produced the jpeg versions of the illustrations says, quite reasonably I think, that though the original engravings are in the public domain the jpegs he has made of them are copyright. He's given me permission to use them for the MobileRead Forum, but has asked that a link be given to his site.
I guess this is analogous to Harry's mention of typographical copyright. Regards, Alex |
08-12-2010, 05:11 AM | #13 |
neilmarr
Posts: 7,215
Karma: 6000059
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Monaco-Menton, France
Device: sony
|
I don't agree with the practice, Eric, but it's generally accepted that a 'publisher' holds rights to internal text design, any editing and the packaging (cover, etc), even when word content is PD ... and for treebooks and ebooks alike.
For instance, the generous Harry T's exclellent treatment of books he so painstakingly prepares, proof reads and formats is, in my opinion, his intellectual property. The treatment, I mean; not the content. The actual law is a little shady on this point, but I for one would never dream of lifting Harry's work on content and merely re-packaging for commercial publication. I can only hope that many others share this moral code. This is also the case in most publishing agreements with contemporary authors, by the way, Ivan. When rights revert to him/her for any reason, those rights -- strictly speaking -- apply only to the original raw manuscript and not to ANY publisher input My own wee house always waives those rights when a contract expires, and we hand over our own cover work or put the author in touch with the copyright-holding artist if the work wasn't handled in house. We also freely offer our ebook files for the author's personal use -- any use, including commercial on-sale. Others, especially the Big Six, stick doggedly to their guns. And that ain't cricket unless there's a darned good reason on an individual contract basis. I strongly feel it should not be standard practice if a contract naturally expires or is curtailed by mutual agreement. Cheers. Neil |
08-12-2010, 05:15 AM | #14 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
|
|
08-12-2010, 05:21 AM | #15 |
neilmarr
Posts: 7,215
Karma: 6000059
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Monaco-Menton, France
Device: sony
|
Right, Harry ... unless the content has been in ANY way adjusted, a fair copy is PD. Cheers. Neil
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony Pocket Edition und Reader Edition auf der IFA | K-Thom | Sony Reader | 0 | 09-09-2009 02:54 PM |
In Copyright? - Copyright Renewal Database launched | Alexander Turcic | News | 26 | 07-09-2008 09:36 AM |
iRex iLiad 2th edition or cybook newest edition, help plz | waddragon | Which one should I buy? | 1 | 02-03-2008 04:21 AM |
Government US Copyright Office: Report on Orphan Works. US Copyright Office. PDF | Nate the great | Other Books | 0 | 01-03-2008 07:16 PM |