12-28-2007, 09:54 AM | #61 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Karma: 10
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: none :(
|
It's not so much as how much I'd want to pay for them, it's how much I CAN pay for them. With average salaries of $600-1000 it's a tough choice.
And indeed, when faced with the fact that the money I payed for something doesn't help the artist but in fact the greedy publisher - is it any surprise I turn to pirated material? Don't get me wrong here, I do not support piracy just because of the price issue. I've bought things I valued at a price I can afford. I've also bought some things beyond that price and ended up disappointed, not because of the price, but because the product I bough had an added benefit packed in - buyer's remorse. What puzzles me as an aspiring artist (both music, writing and digital art) is that the public stigmatizes fans that illegally acquire material they like without denying it to others but at the same time silently accepts the outrageous percentages publishers place on author contracts. So in retrospect, I can say that those $4 don't just give me a product I am interested, they also give me the emotional satisfaction that somewhere, a greedy CEO won't be buying a new Ferrari with my money. And that's something that goes way away beyond the $4 I payed for it. |
12-28-2007, 10:16 AM | #62 | |
Wizard
Posts: 4,395
Karma: 1358132
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Device: Palm TX, CyBook Gen3
|
Quote:
Now, of course, they're all in favour of enforcing international copyright. It isn't their morals that have changed; it's their self-interest. |
|
Advert | |
|
12-28-2007, 10:19 AM | #63 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
If you don't want to support a publisher, buy directly from the artist. But think about all the artists you don't even know about, the ones waiting tables or tilling fields today, because a publisher never promoted them. Sure, maybe he could be driving a Rabbit as easily as a Ferrari... let him worry about how he wastes his money. And as it is, your stealing is hurting the author a lot more than the publisher. |
|
12-28-2007, 10:36 AM | #64 |
Enthusiast
Posts: 28
Karma: 10
Join Date: Dec 2007
Device: none :(
|
I'm going to make the assumption that books are actually advertised where you live. I can't remember when was the last time somebody advertised a book here by any mass media system.
The only advertisement I did see/hear were posters in bookshops, reviews in various magazines (games in this case, not books), word of mouth and various conventions (which are themselves poorly advertised). In conclusion, advertisement is NOT one of those things publishers put a lot of money in. I'm afraid that I fail to see how I am hurting the artist more when he is losing a measly 6-8% compared to the publisher's lion's share of 92%. |
12-28-2007, 10:37 AM | #65 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
As I've said, publishers can serve a purpose in promoting an artist. But it's hard to excuse years of monopolistic and domineering behavior, even as they tried to do good, and so they are left with little sympathy in the market. |
|
Advert | |
|
12-28-2007, 10:48 AM | #66 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
|
Quote:
2. Making an unauthorized copy is not theft. If it was, copyright laws would not exist since the current property laws would suffice. If I were to tell my local law enforcement that my next door neighbor was copying books, they would just shrug and do nothing. Copyright violations are not in their jurisdiction. If I told them that my neighbor stole my books, they would do something because theft is within their jurisdiction. Quote:
Current copyright law allows people who did not create the content "own" the content. This thread is about "copyright morality". Copyright is no longer moral. It is disrespectful to the public. Your expectations that the public should respect copyright is not realistic. |
||
12-28-2007, 11:04 AM | #67 | |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Quote:
If you created a business, you'd be able to pass on ownership of that business to your wife or children to provide them with income after your death. Copyright law allows you to do the same, albeit only for 70 years after your death. |
|
12-28-2007, 11:53 AM | #68 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
12-28-2007, 12:06 PM | #69 |
Has got to the black veil
Posts: 542
Karma: 2144168
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Device: Kobo Aura One, Kindle Paperwhite 2
|
I don't think you're going to be able to just tell young people "Downloading is stealing and it's wrong and therefore you shouldn't do it." Did that stop you from doing something you wanted to do at that age? Of course not.
You have to cast it in terms that they will understand: what's in it for me if I stop downloading free stuff and start paying for my content? Tell them that if they don't pay for their books, then authors will not be able to afford to write them, publishers will not be able to afford to publish them, and there won't be anything new to read. Also, you can download off the darknet, but in my (admittedly limited) experience with darknet ebooks, they usually are OCRed, badly proofread (if at all), and badly formatted. If they want a good reading experience, pay for a real copy. Explain that you get what you pay for. They're formatted, they will work, they will look nice, it will be a good experience, download and enjoy, and that having that good experience is worth paying for it. (This also assumes availability--in that case, the publishers and authors such as J.K. Rowling who will not allow their stuff to be digitized have to assign some blame to themselves. It also assumes that the items for sale are of good quality. I've purchased some e-books and found tons of proofing errors, which is always disappointing. And the pricing must be fair. Not necessarily cheap, but fair.) Lastly, we have to teach our kids that everything isn't available for instant gratification. If you want to read a book, you have to pay the price and buy it, get it from the library, or go without. The darknet mentality is simply entitlement mentality and a lack of impulse control writ large. I want it, and therefore I must have it NOW NOW NOW. I see it all the time with many (not all, thankfully) young people--they don't understand that, for instance, one has to pay one's dues to move up in business. I have a fairly interesting job and the ones working the more boring entry-level positions want it--but they don't realize that I spent YEARS working crappy jobs for insane and horrible people who treated me like dirt to acquire the experience and skills to get my relatively cool job working for nice people. They want it, and don't understand why they can't have it now (and don't appreciate that they are at least working for nice people in the meantime). |
12-28-2007, 12:18 PM | #70 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
My expectations that the public should respect copyright is common sense. Copyright law may need revising or updating, but that doesn't make it worthless, nor immoral. Strangling the dissemination of ideas by denying due compensation is totalitarian and historically proven to be counter-productive, and that's all you'd accomplish by just abolishing copyright. |
|
12-28-2007, 12:26 PM | #71 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
|
|
12-28-2007, 12:31 PM | #72 | ||
Wizard
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
|
Quote:
How does one compensate someone who is dead? And I'll ask some more: How do you, an author, compensate every other author you've stolen ideas from? How do you compensate the public for the ideas you've taken from the public domain? Copyright, as it stands today, is immoral. It permits a few to take but not give back. IHMO: any author that releases any work under a standard copyright (as opposed to something like Creative Commons) intends to defraud the public. Quote:
You need to reevaluate your expectations. |
||
12-28-2007, 12:37 PM | #73 |
eBook Enthusiast
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
|
Shares in a company aren't "property" either. They are an abstract expression of "ownership" (whatever that means) of the business. I don't believe anyone has ever suggested that one shouldn't be able to pass on shares in one's estate.
|
12-28-2007, 12:39 PM | #74 | |
Connoisseur
Posts: 53
Karma: 60
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Device: PRS-505, N800
|
Quote:
"I personally think most young people have very little money" Just because you can not afford it is absolutely no reason to steal it. It's called "going without".....at least until you can afford it. "I can't find Katharine Kerr's books anywhere else except IRC or Jane Fancher for that matter so options are limited. The Jane Fancher books I've found are only in TXT which isn't all that great. " Many have argued about this point but IMHO this is acceptable ONLY if you have already PURCHASED the paper version. Otherwise it's "go without". "the main problem is lack of selection at reasonable prices at many of the online ebook stores. " Then it's "go without".....see how easy that is . "I also don't buy DVDs because half of them won't play in my computer DVD player which is the only one I own. So I end up having to download movies anyways, which is highly annoying I might add. " This is wrong. The fact that your player does not work is no excuse to steal movies. Buy a new DVD player (or DVD drive) or "go without". |
|
12-28-2007, 01:06 PM | #75 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
|
Quote:
When you don't buy author X's work, author X gets not one penny (beyond whatever advance the pub gave them, if any), and they don't have multiple clients and millions to fall back on. You've slammed him. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NYT: "Amazon Threatens Publishers as Apple Looms" | Kali Yuga | News | 23 | 03-19-2010 08:14 PM |
"Balanced copyright" and feedback from real people (not just corporate "persons") | llreader | News | 16 | 02-15-2010 08:27 AM |
Fascinating NYT article on Sherlock Holmes copyright | ekaser | News | 18 | 01-23-2010 12:40 PM |
Interesting link to "E-Book Universe" chart | Xia | News | 7 | 10-02-2009 04:33 PM |
Which one should you buy? Interesting "Web Clip" from Gmail. | astra | Which one should I buy? | 7 | 07-18-2008 03:53 AM |