04-11-2022, 10:17 AM | #46 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,976
Karma: 198535232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Transparency? Integrity? You know ... just the things everyone is all so ready to pounce on Google and Apple for not having.
I don't get it. I really don't. You (and seemingly others) are OK with B&N doing things that you admittedly say only benefit B&N, but want to call Apple and/or Google greedy for doing the same things. Is this really a "businesses I like are good and business I don't like are greedy" sort of thing? Even when both businesses are only out for themselves? Because that's the vibe I'm getting from many here. |
04-11-2022, 10:34 AM | #47 |
Guru
Posts: 727
Karma: 10216666
Join Date: Jul 2017
Device: Boox Nova 2
|
I don't get what your point is either. Doing the change 17 months ago isn't any more transparent, nor does it have more integrity while making the user experience worse for longer. And sending more emails to customers earlier about would have just made them seem MORE angry at Google no?
I don't really feel like Google's abuses of their power is quite on the same level. You can say they are both about greed fine. |
Advert | |
|
04-11-2022, 10:38 AM | #48 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,976
Karma: 198535232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
|
04-11-2022, 11:22 AM | #49 | ||
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 6,694
Karma: 86234809
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Device: Kindles
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-11-2022, 01:19 PM | #50 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,349
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
From my point of view, it's often fairly clear when a company is Evil, in the rather tongue-in-cheek way that Page and Brin meant it, as opposed to achieving their wealth and success by serving their customers. Google became the Goliath it is by giving away a bunch services to users (and monetizing the resultant data*) and later by creating a free and open operating system for phones that gave users a lot more freedom and choice than competing systems. Then, instead of continuing that model (which is still hugely profitable, I wager) they started taking away free features, removing much of that freedom, and locking down that OS, undoing many of the things that made them better than the competition and got them where they were. That threw their turn to Evil in to sharp relief. Bill Gates' and Steve Jobs' brand of evil was visible from day one. There's more than one way to succeed in business. I recently read an economics article describing the difference between "shareholder capitalism" and "stakeholder capitalism." I had never heard the terms before. If I understood the idea correctly, shareholder capitalism is what we see when companies seem to put their their short-term profits and their stock value ahead of everything else. Screw other stakeholders: the customers, the employees, the community. Stakeholder capitalism is when a company looks for success by considering all those stakeholders, and increases profits by increasing value to all of them. Provide great products, retain the best talent, foster the future customer base by building goodwill in the community, etc, and all that will line the shareholder's pockets as well. If I have it right, I see the former as "Evil" and the latter as good business. My perception is that Google shifted from the latter towards the former. ApK *Yes, some find the idea of making you and your data the product to be Evil, but I say you knew what you were signing up for. Complaining about that is as dumb as positing a bunch of personal data to share publicly on Facebook then complaining that Facebook shared your data. Last edited by ApK; 04-11-2022 at 01:23 PM. |
|
Advert | |
|
04-11-2022, 01:43 PM | #51 |
the rook, bossing Never.
Posts: 12,276
Karma: 89531599
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper11
|
They bought in Android.
"shareholder capitalism" and "stakeholder capitalism." Those are just two varieties. Google was ALWAYS evil, it was always about the user being the product. That's why they don't seem to charge anything*, because it's the advertisers that are charged. *Their cloud servers are of course charged. There is no Cloud, that's marketing for rental of someone else's server. Unlike 1960s it's connected via the Internet and you have no idea where it is or the security or privacy. |
04-11-2022, 01:48 PM | #52 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,976
Karma: 198535232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Quote:
I am quite invested in the Google infrastructure, to boot (email, calendar, contacts, Google One, etc...). On phone, tablets, and PCs. No complaints about the free and paid-for services I get from them. But as mentioned ... I think in-app purchases are for suckers. I don't play that game. So maybe that's where the difference lies. *shrug* |
|
04-11-2022, 02:33 PM | #53 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,349
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
No doubt some are impacted more than others. I have lost several free features I had come to depend on, I have experienced more and more bugs and performance issues across many products, I've seen a loss of options and flexibility in Android that have forced me into less-optimal solutions, and now I'm notified I'm losing my whole family email platform with the elimination of the free legacy GSuite. So I'm beginning to divest myself of Google as much as I can. The sour taste in my mouth is not merely from having less good free stuff available. It's from the perception (rightly or wrongly, but I think rightly) that the ONLY reason they are making the changes is to gouge more money from an addicted customer base. Not because the economics have changed and the offerings are no longer profitable or sustainable, not because they take too many resources to maintain or support, not because the new offerings are better, and not because they want to make things more secure. (I don't accept the need for security at the cost of being trapped in a child-proofed walled garden, guarded by lawyers.) So, I vote yes, Google is now as greedy as Apple. Where's the poll? I wanna see the results.... ApK Last edited by ApK; 04-11-2022 at 02:39 PM. |
|
04-11-2022, 03:37 PM | #54 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,976
Karma: 198535232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
Obviously your mileage may vary. But many of us just manage to use them without ever even thinking about their motivations/evilness.
The main place I hear people talking about the "bad behavior" of Google/Apple is here. In real life, it's typically only the folks who refuse to use the likes of Apple/Google/Microsoft/Amazon/Facebook/Twitter/ESPN/CNN/FOX/Reddit/Stackoverflow, etc... and only browse the internet via VPN/Tor that I hear discussing the bad behavior of tech giants. *shrug* I'll use them all until they don't work for me and my processes. Then I'll do something else. But it won't be because of some perceived greed that I stop using the free services the giants offer. |
04-11-2022, 04:17 PM | #55 | |
Award-Winning Participant
Posts: 7,349
Karma: 67930154
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
|
Quote:
For example, though they are taking away my free Gsuite, which I relied on for email for my personal domains, and I would rather pay for some other company's email service rather than pay Google for their business service, I intend to keep using Gmail as the front end if possible, because it serves me well. Similarly, I think Disney is Evil, but I still subscribe to Disney+, because they haven't screwed me over enough to force me off. Yet. As my son put it "it's Evil, but it's reasonably priced Evil." There are only few orgs I will flatly refuse to engage with period, and several, even huge mega-corps, that have been non-Evil enough to keep my business even if there are some cheaper alternatives. Last edited by ApK; 04-11-2022 at 04:21 PM. |
|
04-11-2022, 08:51 PM | #56 | |
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,738
Karma: 50255637
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Quote:
As far as being "blindsided" it depends on how far back you go. Google in their (hypocritical) "do no evil" stage, invited vendors into their Play Store at very reasonable rates. This is a big part of how they caught up and surpassed Apple's "there's an app for that" early advantage. Now, when these companies are dependent on the platform, they "turn the screw." As I mentioned in an earlier message — at one point Google was "making hay" by comparing their terms to Apple's exorbitant ones (which they basically match now). I've never bought anything from Apple, but I did buy a few eBooks from Google. That won't happen again. |
|
04-11-2022, 09:10 PM | #57 | ||
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,738
Karma: 50255637
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for "paying for their own infrastructure," that's exactly what Google is NOT allowing them to do, use their own infrastructure. They (long ago) had it paid for. Apple's and Google's greed is doing a pretty good job of getting rid of it, so you may get your wish. Me, I kind of like picking something out of the store and buying it from my phone (rarely, but it's still nice for spur of the moment purchases). Fortunately I can still do it from the eBook devices, so not a huge loss. At a reasonable rate, Apple and Google could have probably made a "tidy sum" of cash from their competitor's in-app sales, but greed often shunts common sense. |
||
04-11-2022, 09:19 PM | #58 |
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,738
Karma: 50255637
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Why? They were able to continue selling, in-app at a non-crippling fees, until now. To continue doing so, until the deadline was the act of prudent businessmen. Just because an exorbitant fee is coming, doesn't mean you should stop selling on the platform before the "greed tax" goes into effect. If you competed with Google by selling a book for $10 and then were required to add a 30% surcharge to stay on the platform... would you stay? Not if you wanted to stay in business, you wouldn't.
|
04-11-2022, 09:20 PM | #59 | |
eReader Wrangler
Posts: 7,738
Karma: 50255637
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Tolino Vision 4, Voyage, Clara HD
|
Quote:
|
|
04-12-2022, 07:08 AM | #60 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 27,976
Karma: 198535232
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
|
You all have fun storming the castle. There's c!early too many differences in our philosophies to have any meaningful discussion about this.
Last edited by DiapDealer; 04-12-2022 at 07:11 AM. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apple and Google agree to dismiss all Lawsuits | frahse | News | 3 | 05-18-2014 01:31 AM |
Google's Android is Eating Apple's Lunch | SeaKing | News | 554 | 01-06-2013 08:57 PM |
How long will Apple and Google's Android last? | SeaKing | News | 78 | 04-14-2012 12:00 PM |
Apple Google Patent Fight, part II | RockdaMan | Android Devices | 19 | 07-22-2011 01:22 PM |
Apple v. Google: Background on their conflict | Marseille | Alternative Devices | 4 | 03-22-2010 07:40 PM |