09-16-2018, 10:57 PM | #31 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
|
09-16-2018, 11:35 PM | #32 | |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,812
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
Authors that do not follow genre-convention (eg: "Literary" authors) take a risk. They ask the readers to take a journey that is not familiar, that the reader may well misinterpret. Once the cooperation goes astray it becomes like a three-legged race where the pair get tangled up, and no one is going anywhere. It's no one's fault, necessarily*, it's just the way it sometimes turns out - a consequence of the risk taken. (* Yes, there are inadequate authors and there are lazy readers, but in cases like we see here I think we can discount these as explanations - there is ample evidence that neither is true.) |
|
Advert | |
|
09-16-2018, 11:58 PM | #33 | |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,812
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
I am still wondering about the boat they go to see near the end. Is there some particular significance to the boat and it's location? The location seems important, but I haven't yet worked out why. And why has this fairly simple thing become a widespread rumour among the donors? I keep wondering if I missed something here. |
|
09-17-2018, 12:00 AM | #34 | |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Quote:
Personally I don't regard taking a risk as a hallmark or distinguishing characteristic of literary fiction. In particular I think the only risk that the author took with this book was including any element of science fiction at all. The reason why I did not particularly like it is that it did in fact follow some of the main conventions associated with literary fiction which I am not enamoured of. I will be interested to see whether Cat Lady was able to bring herself to try the book and if so whether she finished it. Her comments on this aspect given her attitude to anything Science Fiction would be interesting. |
|
09-17-2018, 12:18 AM | #35 | |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
Quote:
I too wondered about the boat and its location, but can only speculate. It is quite literally stuck in the Marsh, not entirely divorced from the water but stranded. Perhaps it is intended to be a metaphor for the the life of the donors. And for the futility of escape from their fate. As for the rumour. For the donors, their lives narrowed to hospital beds, the clock at 15 or 10 or 5 to midnight, any chance to escape that world, even for a short time, would be significant. And, unlike real escape, possible. For Ruth, like most or all of the donors seeing the boat, it was likely their last time out of the hospital before completion. |
|
Advert | |
|
09-17-2018, 01:26 AM | #36 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,657
Karma: 73864785
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDXish
Device: Kindle Voyage, various Android devices
|
Quote:
No wonder the book failed for me on several points. He was focusing on something else and sounds like he just didn't care about the world he created for this, just the people. I find that disappointing since I don't think it would have taken too much to provide enough background where I would have been able to suspend my disbelief and focus on the parts he wanted us to focus on. As it is, I was too distracted by what I saw as holes. |
|
09-17-2018, 04:07 AM | #37 | |
Snoozing in the sun
Posts: 10,138
Karma: 115423645
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: iPad Mini, Kobo Touch
|
I am late to the discussion as I have been away from home over the weekend. I shall be able to listen to the audio when I get home tomorrow - thanks for that, latepaul.
I didn’t read this book in any way as Science Fiction, but more as an allegory of the way we consider “the other” as less than ourselves, whether that is a fellow human who is a refugee for example, or a non-human creature which we consider to be there for our use and convenience, unworthy of consideration. Quote:
One thing in the book which I noticed particularly was the emptiness of the parts of England through which Kathy travels, especially emphasised by the bleak setting of the end of the book. It was almost as if all the vibrancy of life was closed off from the path each of these so-called donors had to travel, down “the way to dusty death”. I found the very simplicity of the telling of the story only made its implications the more chilling. I have more to add, but will leave it until I get home tomorrow. Last edited by Bookpossum; 09-17-2018 at 04:11 AM. |
|
09-17-2018, 06:26 AM | #38 | |
Professor of Law
Posts: 3,667
Karma: 66000002
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Device: Kobo Elipsa, Kobo Libra H20, Kobo Aura One, KoboMini
|
I am currently experiencing minor flooding (the bridge in and out of my neighborhood has been washed out by a cresting creek), so I am a bit late to discussing my own nomination.
I see that many a strong feeling has been elicited, and that is all I can hope for in a book club selection. A few comments that, hopefully, I can expand on later: First, the book got a lot of attention in the medical realm when it was published, so clearly, bioethicists don't find the question concluded as some of you do. In fact, in a review in the Nursing Standard nursing journal, the editor stated that she "fretted about these children long after [she] had finished reading." (Gray, Jean. Nursing Standard (through 2013); London Vol. 20, Iss. 14-16, (Dec 14, 2005-Jan 3, 2006): 29.) There is also a great discussion of the novel as abolitionist literature rather than dystopia in the Human Rights Quarterly. I quote some of it here: Quote:
I know that for most of us, the question of cloning of this kind is long-since decided. But viewing it as a narrative of modern day slavery gives it a different flavor. Clearly this is taken to an extreme, but the people who will be donors are also forced to provide for the post-operative care and mental well-being of those already undergoing donations. A few of you have termed this "alternative history" and I think that goes hand in hand with bfisher's comment below. We know nothing about this cloning program except that it started just after the war. We assume that this is WWII. Is it not just possible that more of the Nazi science bled out into the wider world in this version of post-war Europe? We never see mention of any other countries or wars after that. I will try to respond to more later, but I'm back to flood watch now. |
|
09-17-2018, 11:29 AM | #39 | |
cacoethes scribendi
Posts: 5,812
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
|
Quote:
The fact that the book does involve cloning in its plot will obviously raise some thoughts regarding the subject, but I think it's important to realise that vague concept presented in the book is far too nebulous a base from which to discuss the technicalities and ethics of cloning in our world (as opposed to the fait accompli presented in the alternative world in Never Let Me Go). The book also involves organ donation (or something similar), so it might also raise some thoughts regarding that subject - but the same disclaimer applies: the book isn't about organ donation and does not provide sufficient detail about the subject to form a basis for a technical or ethical discussion of organ donation in our world. It is interesting to try and consider the book in abolitionist terms. I can see how snippets in there (particularly in the explanation presented by Miss Emily) could be interpreted in this light. It's something a reader might read into the story but I think the story itself is too one sided for it to be very convincing in this regard. The clones seem remote. There is insufficient conflict, or even basic interaction, with the wider population for slavery to feel like an appropriate analogue. I am fairly certain there is interaction with the wider population (that scene in Norfolk seems to demonstrate that it happens), but there seems to be no sense of conflict - at least not from the perspective of the clones - merely self-inflicted isolation. The clones are accepting of their role in society. That mild and apparently ungrudging acceptance is one of the many interesting - and disturbing - things about the story. P.S. I am very pleased you nominated this book! I hope the flooding doesn't get too severe. |
|
09-17-2018, 12:15 PM | #40 | |
Wizard
Posts: 2,657
Karma: 73864785
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PDXish
Device: Kindle Voyage, various Android devices
|
Quote:
I don't think anyone is going to try to debate the technicalities of how the cloning happens but the ethics of doing the cloning, in the methods and for the purposes shown in the book, is fair game and there certainly is enough to talk about in regards to our world. Since the novel is presented as in almost our world with a different technological path "after the war", the great big hole of "what could have changed so radically that people will accept this practice" is relevant. I can't think of anything where society would change this much and be accepting of this practice. |
|
09-17-2018, 02:10 PM | #41 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,375
Karma: 26915798
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ireland
Device: Kindle Oasis 3, 4G, iPad Air 2, iPhone IE
|
Quote:
That is why I very much would like to know more about the setting and the external society but I suppose that the author would say that the book’s external fictional world is not the concern of this novel. But I also found that the book kept (keeps) me thinking and like you “I’ll never think of the word ‘completion’ in quite the same way again.” Last edited by fantasyfan; 09-17-2018 at 11:37 PM. |
|
09-17-2018, 02:55 PM | #42 |
Almost legible
Posts: 1,457
Karma: 4611110
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In a high desert, CA
Device: Galaxy Note 9, Galaxy Tab A (2017), Likebook P78
|
So, no time to read through the entries here. Actually, not really a lot of time to give a full analysis: I finished reading Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro on Friday, but then took off on an adventure of not-quite-epic proportions this weekend and I have a lot of catching up to do. So my short assessment is as follows:
Ruth was a manipulative, conniving b*tch. Her near-final act was to "apologize" for keeping Kathy and Tom apart for nearly their whole lives merely because they had a connection that Ruth obviously hadn't found up to that point. Which apology, by the way, had a nice little time-bomb attached-- the dashing of hopes when they followed her little goose-chase to see Madame and find out it was all a lie. Yes, I'm certain Ruth already knew the truth... I think she followed that other couple's quest quite keenly and knew what awaited Tommy and Kath when they followed her directions. That's vindictiveness supreme. Her insecurity was painfully obvious, and it's almost disingenuous of Kathy and Tom to not see this, but then they were all sheltered through their youth, were they not? The second part of the book was a bit of a slog, the first part held little interest, and I had to wait until the final act before becoming fully engaged in the narrative. But I made it through and I will probably never read this book again, but I am not regretting it. |
09-17-2018, 03:02 PM | #43 |
Wizard
Posts: 2,835
Karma: 10700629
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Canada
Device: Onyx Nova
|
Good book. It's strength is it's depiction of young life in a school environment. Ishiguro really is exceptional at evoking a character's reality. It transported me. Regarding all the sci-fi dystopian stuff, I think he did a good job. It was beautifully handled. A bit bleak, but then so was Remains of the Day and Artist of the Floating World. Ultimately, Ishiguro is a brilliant writer, and he showcases his ability in this book. I enjoyed it. Recommended. The sci-fi element is incidental.
|
09-17-2018, 04:13 PM | #44 | ||
E-reader Enthusiast
Posts: 4,873
Karma: 36507503
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis 3; Kobo Aura One; iPad Mini 5
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-17-2018, 06:58 PM | #45 |
Wizard
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
|
For those of you who find this cloning scenario difficult to believe, I ask you to engage in an uncomfortable thought experiment. Let's say you have a Child with a bright future and most of their lives ahead of them. Your child is diagnosed with Cancer. You are fortunate indeed. Only a few short years ago this particular type of cancer would have destined them to an early death after much suffering. But now it can be cured with a series of simple injections, the latest result of extensive scientific research. This miracle drug, like many others in the last 10 years or so, can only be produced through the use of human organs, which have previously undiscovered properties promising, in time, cures for just about anything.
Now let's assume that you know nothing about how the drug is produced. As a moral person, do you have a duty to enquire into how that drug was developed and produced? And then allow your child to die? Perhaps the solution is to save your child? After all, quantities of the drug are available. The damage done in producing it cannot be undone. You can then fight to bring the program to public attention, denying others the ability to save their loved ones in the future if you succeed. A lovely rationalisation. Does your answer change if you have heard vague rumours about the program? How about if you had watched TV specials and read newspaper articles exposing it? Together, of course, with the balancing view. These are not human beings. Only clones created specifically for this purpose. Not people. They have no souls. Another lovely rationalisation. But human beings love rationalisation. The fact is that as much as we may talk about knowing what we would do and congratulate ourselves on our virtue, the only true test comes when we ourselves are placed in that position. Which I fervently hope none of us are. For myself, I think I would save my child. I doubt I would bother with the rationalisations. Afterwards I'd probably just try not to think about it. If my sleep was really disturbed perhaps I would campaign against the practice, having reaped its benefits. But the reality is that if faced with the same choice later, my decision would likely be the same. Perhaps I could refuse the drug for myself in some circumstances, but I doubt I could do so for a loved one. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kazuo Ishiguro Awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature | astrangerhere | News | 25 | 10-17-2017 10:53 PM |
MobileRead September 2015 Discussion: Candide (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 16 | 09-27-2015 12:38 PM |
Literary The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro | sun surfer | Book Clubs | 30 | 02-13-2015 12:36 AM |
MobileRead September 2014 Discussion: The Grapes of Wrath (spoilers) | WT Sharpe | Book Clubs | 18 | 10-26-2014 02:37 PM |
Literary The MobileRead Literary Book Club September 2011 Discussion: Unbroken | sun surfer | Book Clubs | 12 | 10-14-2011 04:24 PM |