03-06-2013, 03:38 PM | #346 |
hopeless n00b
Posts: 5,110
Karma: 19597086
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: in the middle of nowhere
Device: PW4, PW3, Libra H2O, iPad 10.5, iPad 11, iPad 12.9
|
I started reading Harry Potter when I was 12 (around a year after the first book was released). Even at that age, I had a couple of classmates who disparage it because of the hype without even trying to read the book first. Almost 30 now and I still enjoy Harry Potter even now (well, the first four books, anyway).
|
03-11-2013, 09:51 PM | #347 |
Cat Mom
Posts: 14
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisiana
Device: Likebook Mars
|
I get picked on occasionally (usually by strangers) for what I choose to read. When I first read Twilight (hardback borrowed from my grandmother before I had my nook), I had some random old guy (probably 50s or 60s) walk up to me in the mall and start talking about how bad the Twilight books are. When he finally stopped for a breath, I asked him if he had personally read the books. "No, why would I read that garbage." "Well, if you haven't read it, how do you know it's garbage?" "Everyone says it is..." Yeah, that conversation was over fairly quickly after I pointed out how idiotic that train of thought was. I have a personal rule that I cannot bad-mouth a book without having read it myself. However, even books that I bad-mouth because I don't like them usually get a disclaimer of "just because they're not for me, doesn't mean they aren't for you."
Just the other day some lady around my age (late 20s to early 30s) asked me what I was reading on my nook and how I liked my nook. First, I told her I loved my nook and then showed her some of the nifty little features like the glow function. Then I told her I was actually reading all of the old Goosebumps series since I hadn't read them since I was in grade school and I knew I hadn't read all of them. "YOU'RE READING CHILDREN'S BOOKS?!" I had no idea it was a crime to read the Goosebumps series as an adult... o_O |
Advert | |
|
03-11-2013, 10:18 PM | #348 | |
Are you gonna eat that?
Posts: 1,633
Karma: 23215128
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phillipsburg, NJ
Device: Kindle 3, Nook STG
|
Quote:
|
|
03-11-2013, 10:35 PM | #349 |
Groupie
Posts: 170
Karma: 1033664
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: Kindle 3, Nook Color, & Dell Axim X50v
|
Another King favorite is the Tallisman.
|
03-11-2013, 10:55 PM | #350 |
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Karma: 10
Join Date: Mar 2013
Device: nexus7
|
Snobbery is the reason I stopped getting bogged down in reading circles
|
Advert | |
|
03-11-2013, 11:39 PM | #351 |
Star Gawker
Posts: 526
Karma: 6944314
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Spruce Grove, AB Canada
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
|
Tastes are subjective. Anyone that thinks their taste is the only right one are narrow thinkers.
I don't like the whole "literary" snobbery out there that only books that some critics or academics think are classics are worthy. |
03-12-2013, 03:31 PM | #352 |
Fledgling Demagogue
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
|
I don't find it necessary to trash people who privilege what gets called literature and/or literary fiction. I'd be amazed if the author of Twilight claimed to hate Jane Austen.
There has to be a better way to appear tolerant than to be intolerant of what one thinks intolerant people read. The person who goes out of their way to berate your interest in paranormal romance wants you to know their taste is better than yours. Having to do that isn't the sign of a great self-image. Most people I know who hate Twilight would leave you alone. I think it's a kind of sin to insult someone because they're enthusiastic about a book. Neither is it fair to ascribe a lack of humility and courtesy to people who dislike paranormal romances. We tend to see only the prejudices that we ourselves experience, but rest assured: the person who loves what we hate and vice versa catches heat over their taste, too. |
03-13-2013, 04:20 AM | #353 |
Addict
Posts: 386
Karma: 3553492
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Perth Western Australia
Device: kindle oasis
|
I would never knock the Twilight books. I think they got a huge number of teens into reading including my daughter. Now reading them at what ever age again I have no problem. But when you identify to such an extent with a teenage character you act like a teen at a Beaber concert I will keep my back to the wall and back away from you very fast. It is creepy. I have had friends on facebook my age, 40 something drooling and carrying on like love struck 13 year olds over edward. It just creeps me, I del them super fast.
applesauce |
03-13-2013, 07:23 AM | #354 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
Twilight is sure to provide ample fodder for future social historians: a century old introvert, constantly reliving his teen years, romancing a suicidal, clinically depressed teenager? I can just see the class discussions: "What does that say about the times and the male half of the species that an entire demographic cohort considered that a romantic fantasy?" |
|
03-13-2013, 10:17 AM | #355 |
Wizard
Posts: 1,340
Karma: 1160346
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Southport, GB
Device: Kindle Voyage, PW Signature edition
|
The thing I find worse than people who are snobby about what somebody is reading are those authors who try to deny their book is in a particular genre as they are snobby about that, it is something that you see particularly often when it comes to books that are clearly scifi and then an author or reviewer tries to use some convoluted argument for why it is something else.
|
03-13-2013, 12:33 PM | #356 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2013, 11:15 AM | #357 | |
Fledgling Demagogue
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
|
Often, it isn't a question of the writer's being snobbish about their own book. It's a question of their not wanting the book's readership and ad campaign to be marginalized, particularly if they intended the book for a larger audience from the beginning -- one which includes science fiction readers without being confined to them exclusively.
Then, too, if a book is "clearly science fiction" (as you put it) but the writer was concerned with focusing on some aspect of present society and culture or exploring the ramifications of preexisting ones, I don't blame them at all for wanting to talk about that and nothing else. SF lends itself particularly well to satire, parable and cultural criticism. And if a book takes a meta approach to genre, I don't blame an author for wanting to clarify they take up the lens of SF here and the western or detective novel there, but the book itself is meant to explore something larger. Seen without prejudice, genre is merely a limitation of subject, theme, unities, conventions and/or kinds of characters. Saying that something you've written doesn't follow the circumscriptions of a given genre is hardly a condemnation of the genre itself. Every work of fiction involves an acceptance of certain limitations and a rejection of others. What would you call Calvino's Cosmicomics and T Zero? For all I know, he called the books SF even when his publishers did not. But if he called them something else, I can see the justification for that as well. When Joss Whedon was asked whether he intended Buffy the Vampire Slayer to be for a larger audience or a specialized one, he said it was "made for the zeitgeist" from inception. Given the scope of cultural references in that show, its paradigmatic setup of young adulthood as existing in a state of enforced purgatory, and its satire of the undermining of personal identity in mass culture, I can see why he didn't think of the show or its audience as confined to the vampire genre he was exploring even as he respected and enjoyed that genre himself. Quote:
Last edited by Prestidigitweeze; 03-17-2013 at 11:36 AM. |
|
03-17-2013, 12:53 PM | #358 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2013, 03:00 PM | #359 |
Fledgling Demagogue
Posts: 2,384
Karma: 31132263
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: White Plains
Device: Clara HD; Oasis 2; Aura HD; iPad Air; PRS-350; Galaxy S7.
|
His focus wasn't narrow at all when you understand that the point is want vs. need, not 100 vs. 1,000. The idea was that he made the show for however many people needed to see it, which turned out to be four to six million regular viewers.
|
03-17-2013, 07:49 PM | #360 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
|
He just wanted to *really* draw people in, to get them so involved with the characters you *needed* to know what comes next. Kinda like the way LOST drew it its audience.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
By the power of Font Snobs! | anamardoll | General Discussions | 30 | 06-07-2011 10:26 PM |
The truth about THE TRUTH BE TOLD! (sort of) | HPOliver | Self-Promotions by Authors and Publishers | 0 | 11-29-2010 01:21 PM |
Biography Truth, Sojourner: The Narrative of Sojourner Truth, v.1, 10 Feb 2008 | vivaldirules | IMP Books | 0 | 02-21-2008 08:30 AM |
Biography Truth, Sojourner: The Narrative of Sojourner Truth, v.1, 10 Feb 2008 | vivaldirules | BBeB/LRF Books | 1 | 02-10-2008 03:58 PM |
Biography Truth, Sojourner: The Narrative of Sojourner Truth, v.1, 10 Feb 2008 | vivaldirules | Kindle Books | 0 | 02-10-2008 01:16 PM |