|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-16-2019, 08:44 AM | #16 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
I had exactly the same thought. Show us those conversations and their deep connection, don't just claim it. That was totally unearned. |
|
11-16-2019, 08:55 AM | #17 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
I've said that I prefer to read book club selections rather than listen to them and I started out going back and forth, but I found that it was much easier to take in audio. Overall, I liked both performances; I found that Gilbert's tendency to be overwrought was somewhat excessive as read by Davidson, but then as I've said elsewhere, he was using a voice he's also used in a long-running series I follow, and the whole effect was a little bizarre.
My weak defense of the book is that I was entertained by it. It held my interest and I was happy enough to go on with it. Somewhat in the category of "good trash"; Anne's long apprenticeship with her sisters meant that the prose was serviceable as opposed to awful, although the book itself was a flat failure technically and in terms of characterization. The plotting was decent and certainly the subject matter was arresting. I have to agree that I found Gilbert dispicable. His sneering contempt for most of his coterie was unforgivable. I can't blame Eliza, in fact. He had led her on; things has got to the point where it was reasonable for her to expect a declaration; instead, she was obviously and publicly dumped. |
Advert | |
|
11-16-2019, 11:03 AM | #18 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2019, 11:12 AM | #19 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
I agree with the comments about Gilbert; yet he is the romantic hero of the piece, the man Helen comes to love and trust. I don't think Anne Bronte wanted the reader to believe that Helen is making another stupid mistake, but it sure seems like another stupid mistake, especially considering the violent attack on Lawrence. Gilbert's main "virtue" seemed to be that he wasn't a drunkard, and I guess that was enough for Helen.
I don't see how this is much of a feminist novel--it is to a point, with Helen defying convention and leaving her husband, but that is undercut by her return. Really? Bronte couldn't have just had mean old Arthur die offstage and free Helen to marry again (or live happily alone)? No, she has to have noble Helen burnish her halo and return to caress the fevered brow of her oppressor. Such saintliness! But then all the emphasis on religion annoyed me. That's too mild a statement--it made me want to scream. While I'm hating on Helen--the doctoring of booze to make her son sick was horrifying. |
11-16-2019, 11:22 AM | #20 | ||
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
And while I'm on the subject, it was flatly unbelievable he didn't destroy her diary after he read it, or even more to the point, keep it under lock and key for evidence. Quote:
Going back to your first point, I initially thought this had pretensions to feminism, with Mrs. Markham's "all for the man" attitude and Rose's objections. But that was pretty much it. |
||
Advert | |
|
11-16-2019, 12:02 PM | #21 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2019, 02:11 PM | #22 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,015
Karma: 19767610
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Device: ipad, Kindle PW, Kobo Clara; iphone 7
|
Quote:
I can see how the book would be considered feminist, judged within the time and culture that produced it. Helen had many flaws, but she was definitely a strong woman. She refused to allow her husband, the law and religious teaching to determine her fate. And it’s telling that Charlotte didn’t want it republished after Anne’s death, because she thought the subject matter unsuitable. In terms of Helen’s return to her husband, it wasn’t consistent with Helen’s character, or the plot. But Catlady raises an interesting possibility; Bronte may have sent Helen back to stave off objections from readers, or even her sister Charlotte. Or maybe Brontė’s own pious notions of duty got in the way, and she ‘needed’ Helen to try and save Arthur from damnation. Personally, I found the theological worldview of the book suffocating, and completely lacking in insight. That said, I still found the book entertaining enough to want to see what happens, and was rooting for them to get together. Last edited by Victoria; 11-16-2019 at 02:16 PM. |
|
11-16-2019, 02:32 PM | #23 | |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
But worse than that, and one of the my major technical issues with the book, is that by her framing device, letters to a brother-in-law, Anne essentially revealed all her major plot points in advance! Halford would have known all the details of Gilbert's personal life. He reads the letters, knowing from the start, that Gilbert would end up married to Helen. And for the reader, that Gilbert has Helen's diary in his possession removes virtually all uncertainty. |
|
11-16-2019, 04:36 PM | #24 |
Snoozing in the sun
Posts: 10,138
Karma: 115423645
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: iPad Mini, Kobo Touch
|
Yes, the whole thing of the letter-writing was a bad way to tell the story, for all the reasons issybird and others have mentioned.
In the Wikipedia article on the book, there is reference to a Mrs Collins, the wife of a local curate, coming to Haworth in 1840 to appeal for help from the rector, Anne’s father. The husband was an abusive alcoholic. Patrick Brontė advised her to leave her husband, which she did. So the requirements of society and the church might not have had such an influence on Anne in terms of Helen’s return to her husband, unless Anne thought the readership would expect such unbelievable behaviour. |
11-16-2019, 05:24 PM | #25 |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,356
Karma: 52612287
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
|
The structure was indeed odd. I was much more interested in Helen's diary than in whatever Gilbert was going on about. I can certainly see starting the story with the mysterious newcomer to build a bit of suspense, but Bronte chose a clunky way to do it.
Still, I liked this better than Jane Eyre, which I find atrocious; I hated Jane when it was assigned in high school and could not get through an attempted reread a few years ago. |
11-16-2019, 05:53 PM | #26 | |||
E-reader Enthusiast
Posts: 4,873
Karma: 36507503
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southwest, USA
Device: Kindle Oasis 3; Kobo Aura One; iPad Mini 5
|
I have lots to say but not much time at the moment. I just got back from more traveling and have to work all weekend. My work schedule is super-stressful leading into the holidays.
Quote:
Quote:
Another thing about Anne's work is how much is biographical. I read Agnes Grey which is based on her experiences as a governess. Some of the characters in this book are modeled after her brother Branwell's problems with drugs/alcohol and having an affair with the mother of the family she was the governess at. Some of Helen's saintliness may have been inspired by an illness Anne had when she was young and feared to die and religion became much more important to her. Quote:
Last edited by Bookworm_Girl; 11-16-2019 at 05:56 PM. |
|||
11-17-2019, 11:05 AM | #27 |
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
I found myself bemused by the way Brontė undercut her story by revealing all her plot points in advance, combined with Gilbert's being incredibly obtuse on the uptake. As mentioned upthread, Gilbert's correspondent being his brother-in-law Halford pulled a whole bunch of punches. Even from the start, when Gilbert described Eliza to him, we knew that he couldn't have ended up with her. So much possible tension and surprise was lost by casting the narrative as correspondence. I wonder if it's that the Brontės as a whole didn't feel comfortable writing in the third person? Jane Eyre's first person narration was fine (and Charlotte didn't feel the need to pretend it was a letter). Emily's unreliable narrator within an unreliable narrator was truly masterful and added a lot of dimension to Wuthering Heights. But the espistolary style was a distinct drawback in this book.
Add to that Gilbert's slowness on the uptake. Who didn't know from the start that Helen wasn't really a widow? That the concealed portrait was of her husband? That Frederick Lawrence was her brother? And there was the awkward business of Arthur's addressing Helen by her first name, when "Miss Lawrence" would have given the show away. Except that we knew, anyway, and the awkward device just emphasized this. The whole book I was just waiting for the reveal on various people and events that I knew were going to happen. Last edited by issybird; 11-17-2019 at 01:09 PM. |
11-17-2019, 03:24 PM | #28 | |
Wizard
Posts: 1,015
Karma: 19767610
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Device: ipad, Kindle PW, Kobo Clara; iphone 7
|
Quote:
However all the excellent critiques of the book’s structure, the author’s foretelling, etc, have me wondering about Charlotte’s reluctance to have the book republished after Anne’s death. I’ve read it was due to the subject matter, but maybe she was also concerned about the quality of the writing. |
|
11-17-2019, 03:55 PM | #29 | |
Snoozing in the sun
Posts: 10,138
Karma: 115423645
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Device: iPad Mini, Kobo Touch
|
Quote:
It’s odd, isn’t it, that AB couldn’t see the value of a slow reveal by an omniscient third person narrator. Apart from anything else, the minute reporting of long conversations in both the letters and the journal were a bit hard to swallow. Really, this is another of those rare books that are much better on film than on the page. |
|
11-17-2019, 04:50 PM | #30 | ||
o saeclum infacetum
Posts: 20,584
Karma: 225000000
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: H2O, Aura One, PW5
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Other Fiction Bronte, Anne: The Tenant Of Wildfell Hall. V2. 16 Mar 2012 | GibbinR | ePub Books | 1 | 04-21-2013 07:49 AM |
Romance Brontė, Anne: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. v1, 8 Mar 2008 | HarryT | Kindle Books | 0 | 03-08-2008 11:13 AM |
Romance Brontė, Anne: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. v1, 8 Mar 2008 | HarryT | BBeB/LRF Books | 0 | 03-08-2008 11:11 AM |
Other Fiction Brontė, Anne: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, v.1, 14 Nov 2007. | Patricia | Kindle Books | 0 | 11-13-2007 07:31 PM |
Other Fiction Brontė, Anne: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, v.1, 14 Nov 2007. | Patricia | BBeB/LRF Books | 0 | 11-13-2007 07:25 PM |