View Single Post
Old 04-20-2016, 06:53 AM   #26
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,195
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by avantman42 View Post
But surely, if Google's actions are a "plain and brazen violation of copyright law" as the Author's Guild says it is, the appeals court would have overturned the original decision?


Then I misunderstood your point. I thought you meant that a copyright owner could lose their copyright if they didn't actively enforce it. I believe that's the case with trademarks, but not copyright.
One never knows what a judge may decide. Failure to defend a copyright might very well land a work in the orphaned works pile. Orphaned works is something that the legal system is struggling with. The abandoned property principle is well entrenched in the common law legal system.

As far as your first point, don't confuse lawyer's rhetoric with the actual legal principles. Lawyers say all sorts of things in the press.

Last edited by pwalker8; 04-20-2016 at 06:56 AM.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote